Building a Full-Stack GenAI Document Copilot with FastAPI and Supabase

By LatestLLM Editorial ·

Building a Full-Stack GenAI Document Copilot with FastAPI and Supabase

Learn how to build a production-ready RAG application using FastAPI, React, and Supabase to query SEC filings with grounded answers and citations.

Key takeaways

  • RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) reduces AI hallucinations by providing the model with specific context from external documents.
  • pgvector is a PostgreSQL extension that allows for the storage and similarity search of high-dimensional embeddings.
  • Hybrid search combines semantic vector search with keyword search to improve retrieval accuracy for technical terms.
  • FastAPI's asynchronous capabilities make it an ideal choice for handling high-latency LLM and database calls.
  • Grounding is the process of forcing an LLM to answer based solely on provided context, ensuring factual accuracy.

Most people stop at writing a clever prompt in a chat box, but the real magic happens when you build a system that connects an LLM to your own private data.

Turning a raw PDF into a conversational intelligence tool is the hallmark of modern AI engineering.

⚡ TL;DR: The Document Copilot is a full-stack RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) application built using FastAPI, React, and Supabase. It utilizes pgvector for embedding storage and hybrid search to allow users to query SEC filings with grounded answers and precise citations.

The Simple Version

Imagine you have a massive textbook containing thousands of pages of complex financial data. If you ask a standard AI a question about it, the AI might try to remember a similar book it read during training, which often leads to "hallucinations"—confident but wrong answers.

A RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system changes the game. Instead of relying on memory, the AI acts like a researcher with a high-speed index. When you ask a question, it quickly flips to the exact page and paragraph needed, reads it, and then summarizes the answer for you.

🎯 Think of it this way: A standard LLM is like a student taking a test from memory. A RAG system is that same student taking an open-book exam with a perfectly indexed set of notes.

How It Actually Works

Building this system requires a pipeline that moves data from a raw document to a chat interface. This process is broken down into four critical stages.

1. Ingestion and Chunking

You can't feed a 100-page SEC filing into an LLM all at once; it's too much data and too expensive. Instead, the system uses chunking, which breaks the document into smaller, manageable pieces of text.

These chunks are then converted into embeddings. An embedding is essentially a long list of numbers (a vector) that represents the mathematical "meaning" of the text.

🎯 Think of it this way: Chunking is like shredding a long legal contract into individual index cards, then labeling each card based on the topic it discusses.

2. Vector Storage with pgvector

Once the text is converted into vectors, it needs a home. This project uses Supabase, which is built on PostgreSQL. By adding the pgvector extension, the database can store these mathematical vectors and perform similarity searches.

When a user asks a question, that question is also converted into a vector. The database then finds the "closest" vectors in its storage, which represent the most relevant pieces of the original document.

3. Retrieval and Grounding

The system doesn't just send the user's question to the AI. It sends the question plus the relevant chunks found in the database. This is called grounding.

The prompt tells the AI: "Using only the following pieces of context, answer the user's question. If the answer isn't there, say you don't know." This drastically reduces the chance of the AI making things up.

4. The Frontend Experience

To make this useful, a professional UI is required. Using React and TypeScript, the application creates a chat interface that doesn't just show text, but also provides citations. This allows the user to click a reference and see exactly which part of the SEC filing the AI used to generate its answer.

Technical Deep Dive

For the developers looking at the architecture, this project follows a modern, decoupled stack designed for scalability and type safety.

The Backend: FastAPI

FastAPI is used for the server because of its native support for asynchronous programming (async/await). This is critical for AI apps because calls to LLM APIs and vector databases can be slow; async allows the server to handle other requests while waiting for the AI to respond.

The backend manages the orchestration between the Supabase client, the embedding model, and the LLM. It handles the logic for chat history, ensuring the AI remembers the previous few turns of the conversation.

Database Architecture: Hybrid Search

While vector search is great for "meaning," it can sometimes miss specific keywords (like a specific company ticker or a unique legal term). This is why the project implements hybrid search.

Hybrid search combines semantic vector search with traditional keyword search (BM25). By merging these two results, the system ensures that it finds the most conceptually relevant text while still catching exact matches for technical terms.

The Frontend Stack: shadcn/ui and Tailwind

The UI is built with React and TypeScript for strict typing, which prevents runtime errors when handling complex AI response objects. Tailwind CSS and shadcn/ui are used to build a clean, enterprise-grade interface rapidly.

The frontend communicates with the FastAPI backend via REST APIs, handling authentication and session management through Supabase Auth to ensure that users only access their own uploaded documents.

Deployment via Railway

To move from local development to production, the project uses Railway. Railway simplifies the deployment of the FastAPI container and the Supabase instance, providing a streamlined CI/CD pipeline where every git push updates the live application.

Why This Matters

The transition from "prompting" to "AI Engineering" is where the most value is created in the current market. Companies don't need another generic chatbot; they need tools that can analyze their specific financial reports, legal contracts, or technical manuals without hallucinating.

By mastering this stack—FastAPI, pgvector, and React—developers can build "Agentic" workflows. These are systems that don't just answer questions but can autonomously retrieve data, verify it against sources, and present it in a structured format.

Ultimately, this architecture solves the biggest hurdle in enterprise AI: trust. By providing grounded answers and clickable citations, the AI moves from being a "black box" to a transparent tool that a human can easily verify.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a standard LLM and a RAG system?

A standard LLM relies on its internal training data, which can be outdated or inaccurate. A RAG system retrieves relevant, up-to-date documents from an external source and provides them to the LLM to ensure the answer is grounded in fact.

Why use pgvector instead of a dedicated vector database?

pgvector allows you to keep your relational data (users, chat history) and your vector data (embeddings) in a single PostgreSQL database, simplifying your architecture and maintaining ACID compliance.

What is 'chunking' and why is it necessary?

Chunking is the process of splitting large documents into smaller segments. This is necessary because LLMs have a limited 'context window' (maximum amount of text they can process at once) and smaller chunks allow for more precise retrieval.

Sources

Source: “Building a Full-Stack GenAI Document Copilot with FastAPI and Supabase” on YouTube by Dave Ebbelaar

Tags: GenAI, RAG, FastAPI, Supabase, AI Engineering, React

Related articles